On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 18:22 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > The X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a > couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the > current DT files claim. [] > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi [] > @@ -1,46 +1,9 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
Nope - NAK... That's not the correct identifier. It's not GPL-2.0, it's either GPL-2.0+ or GPL-2.0-or-later Check this for all submitted patches in this series. > /* > * sama5d2.dtsi - Device Tree Include file for SAMA5D2 family SoC > * > * Copyright (C) 2015 Atmel, > * 2015 Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]> > - * > - * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms > - * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual > - * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a > - * whole. > - * > - * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > - * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > - * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the > - * License, or (at your option) any later version. >
