On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:57:07 +0200 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just to remove confusion. Your example is to show that the new > > tracepoints would have shown that the NMI was long due to the printk? As > > running printk from NMI (even with the delayed output) isn't a normal > > path. > > The example is "to show that the new tracepoints would have shown that the NMI > was longer than what the existing tracepoint pointed." The example was not the > best, I agree.. but... it serves to illustrate the idea. Sure, just wanted to verify that was your intent. Thanks, -- Steve
