On 11/04/19 8:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvu...@ti.com> [190410 04:15]:
>> +Example:
>> +--------
>> +The following example demonstrates both interrupt router node and the 
>> consumer
>> +node(main gpio) on the AM654 SoC:
>> +
>> +main_intr: interrupt-controller0 {
>> +    compatible = "ti,sci-intr";
>> +    ti,intr-trigger-type = <1>;
>> +    interrupt-controller;
>> +    interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
>> +    #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +    ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>> +    ti,sci-dst-id = <56>;
>> +    ti,sci-rm-range-girq = <0x1>;
>> +};
> 
> To me it seems there should not be too many of these interrupt
> controller nodes for each SoC. Maybe you're already planning on
> doing it, but I suggest that you just add more specific compatibles
> and then look up the dst-id from a mapping table in the driver
> similar to what patch 04/12 in this series is already doing.
> 
> That way you don't need to add custom TI specific (firmware
> defined) device tree properties listed above ;)

I am tired of arguing on this. We did close this topic in the previous version
of this series. Why do you want to keep re visiting the same. Sorry, I am not
going change unless I receive a Nack from Marc or Rob.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

Reply via email to