On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 19:11 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Can you try this patch?
Thanks, Christoph It worked fine, both for normal kernel and for dump kernel on Cell. Is this patch intended to go mainline? > > From 74863f472810cb58dc56dde050616581d38f7673 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:09:00 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] SLUB: Do not fail on broken memory configurations > > Print a big fat warning and do what is necessary to continue if a node > is marked as up but allocations from the node do not succeed. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > mm/slub.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index 1488e71..fc82751 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -1877,9 +1877,16 @@ static struct kmem_cache_node * __init > early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(gfp_t gfpflag > > BUG_ON(kmalloc_caches->size < sizeof(struct kmem_cache_node)); > > - page = new_slab(kmalloc_caches, gfpflags | GFP_THISNODE, node); > - > + page = new_slab(kmalloc_caches, gfpflags, node); > BUG_ON(!page); > + > + if (page_to_nid(page) != node) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "SLUB: Unable to allocate memory from " > + "node %d\n", node); > + printk(KERN_ERR "SLUB: Allocating a useless per node structure" > + " in order to be able to continue\n"); > + } > + > n = page->freelist; > BUG_ON(!n); > page->freelist = get_freepointer(kmalloc_caches, n); -- Lucio Correia Software Engineer IBM LTC Brazil - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/