Hi,

On 19. 4. 15. 오후 11:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> There is no real benefit from doing so, hence let's drop that rate setting
> for consistency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> index 69581c9082d4..d62fb1b0d9bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> @@ -648,8 +648,6 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>               return PTR_ERR(tegra->emc_clock);
>       }
>  
> -     clk_set_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX);
> -

It seems like that initialize the emc_clock as the supported maximum clock.
But, if the rate for emc_clock initialized by either bootloader or clock driver
and it's well working until this code, actually, it is not necessary.

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com>


>       tegra->rate_change_nb.notifier_call = tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb;
>       err = clk_notifier_register(tegra->emc_clock, &tegra->rate_change_nb);
>       if (err) {
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Reply via email to