From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>

Currently the pick_next_task() loop is convoluted and ugly because of
how it can drop the rq->lock and needs to restart the picking.

For the RT/Deadline classes, it is put_prev_task() where we do
balancing, and we could do this before the picking loop. Make this
possible.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c      |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/deadline.c  | 14 +++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/fair.c      |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/idle.c      |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/rt.c        | 14 +++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h     |  4 ++--
 kernel/sched/stop_task.c |  2 +-
 7 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 32ea79fb8d29..9dfa0c53deb3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5595,7 +5595,7 @@ static void calc_load_migrate(struct rq *rq)
                atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks);
 }
 
-static void put_prev_task_fake(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
+static void put_prev_task_fake(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
 {
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fadfbfe7d573..56791c0318a2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1773,13 +1773,25 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct 
*prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
        return p;
 }
 
-static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
 {
        update_curr_dl(rq);
 
        update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
        if (on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
                enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
+
+       if (rf && !on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
+               /*
+                * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
+                * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
+                * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've
+                * not yet started the picking loop.
+                */
+               rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
+               pull_dl_task(rq);
+               rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+       }
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f7e631e692a3..41ec5e68e1c5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7081,7 +7081,7 @@ done: __maybe_unused;
 /*
  * Account for a descheduled task:
  */
-static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
+static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
 {
        struct sched_entity *se = &prev->se;
        struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index dd64be34881d..1b65a4c3683e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct 
task_struct *p, int fl
        resched_curr(rq);
 }
 
-static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
+static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
 {
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index adec98a94f2b..51ee87c5a28a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct 
*prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
        return p;
 }
 
-static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
 {
        update_curr_rt(rq);
 
@@ -1605,6 +1605,18 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct 
task_struct *p)
         */
        if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
                enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+       if (rf && !on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
+               /*
+                * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
+                * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
+                * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've
+                * not yet started the picking loop.
+                */
+               rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
+               pull_rt_task(rq);
+               rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+       }
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index bfcbcbb25646..4cbe2bef92e4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ struct sched_class {
        struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq,
                                               struct task_struct *prev,
                                               struct rq_flags *rf);
-       void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
+       void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct 
rq_flags *rf);
        void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ struct sched_class {
 static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
        WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != prev);
-       prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+       prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, NULL);
 }
 
 static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
index 47a3d2a18a9a..8f414018d5e0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void yield_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
        BUG(); /* the stop task should never yield, its pointless. */
 }
 
-static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
+static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct 
rq_flags *rf)
 {
        struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
        u64 delta_exec;
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to