On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:55:01AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Yeah, you're right. And if we push the patch a bit further to not take > loop_ctl_mutex for invalid ioctl number, that would fix the problem. I > can send a fix.
Huh? We don't take it until in lo_simple_ioctl(), and that patch doesn't get to its call on invalid ioctl numbers. What am I missing here?
