Hi James, On Thu, 2 May 2019, James Morse wrote:
> Having an separately posted dependency like this is tricky, as this code > can't be > used/tested until the other bits are merged. ... > Looks good to me. I think this patch should go with its two dependencies, I'm > not sure why > it got split off... The split was due to my suggestion to Yash, I think. The motivation was to decouple the L2 cache controller driver's journey upstream from the EDAC driver's upstream path. The patches will go up via separate trees, so the idea was to avoid blocking the L2 cache controller driver on the EDAC driver review path. Thanks for your review, - Paul
