On 20/05/19 12:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The check for entry->index == 0 is done twice. One time should
> be sufficient.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Vitaly already noticed this in his review to the "Fix a condition
>  in test_hv_cpuid()" patch a couple of days ago, but so far I haven't
>  seen any patch yet on the list that fixes this ... if I missed it
>  instead, please simply ignore this patch.
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> index 9a21e912097c..8bdf1e7da6cc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@ static void test_hv_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 
> *hv_cpuid_entries,
>               TEST_ASSERT(entry->index == 0,
>                           ".index field should be zero");
>  
> -             TEST_ASSERT(entry->index == 0,
> -                         ".index field should be zero");
> -
>               TEST_ASSERT(entry->flags == 0,
>                           ".flags field should be zero");
>  
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

Reply via email to