On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 19:33, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 20/05/19 13:22, Wanpeng Li wrote: > >> > >> We would like to move wait_lapic_expire() just before vmentry, which would > >> place wait_lapic_expire() again inside the extended quiescent state. Drop > >> the tracepoint, but add instead another one that can be useful and where > >> we can check the status of the adaptive tuning procedure. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/15/1435 > > > > Maybe Sean's comment is reasonable, per-vCPU debugfs entry for > > adaptive tuning and wait_lapic_expire() tracepoint for hand tuning. > > Hmm, yeah, that makes sense. The location of the tracepoint is a bit > weird, but I guess we can add a comment in the code.
Do you need me to post a new patchset? :) Regards, Wanpeng Li
