On 5/22/19 2:12 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > >> Il giorno 22 mag 2019, alle ore 11:02, Srivatsa S. Bhat >> <sriva...@csail.mit.edu> ha scritto: >> >> >> Let's continue here on LKML itself. > > Just done :) > >> The only reason I created the >> bugzilla entry is to attach the tarball of the traces, assuming >> that it would allow me to upload a 20 MB file (since email attachment >> didn't work). But bugzilla's file restriction is much smaller than >> that, so it didn't work out either, and I resorted to using dropbox. >> So we don't need the bugzilla entry anymore; I might as well close it >> to avoid confusion. >> > > No no, don't close it: it can reach people that don't use LKML. We > just have to remember to report back at the end of this.
Ah, good point! > BTW, I also > think that the bug is incorrectly filed against 5.1, while all these > tests and results concern 5.2-rcX. > Fixed now, thank you for pointing out! Regards, Srivatsa VMware Photon OS
