Hi Asmaa, sorry for the long wait. I missed this mail was still sitting in my Drafts folder :(
> >> Am I overlooking something? Why are you protecting an atomic_read with a
> >> spinlock?
>
> A thread would lock the ipmb_dev->lock spinlock (above) for all the code
> below ONLY IF the atomic_read for the request_queue_len reports a value
> different from 0:
Well, not really. The spinlock is taken _before_ the atomic read. But
the read is atomic, so there should be no need. I am asking if the code
could look like this?
+ while (!atomic_read(&ipmb_dev->request_queue_len)) {
+ if (non_blocking)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ res = wait_event_interruptible(ipmb_dev->wait_queue,
+ atomic_read(&ipmb_dev->request_queue_len));
+ if (res)
+ return res;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmb_dev->lock, flags);
+ if (list_empty(&ipmb_dev->request_queue)) {
> if (list_empty(&ipmb_dev->request_queue)) {
> 260 + dev_err(&ipmb_dev->client->dev, "request_queue is
> empty\n");
> 261 + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmb_dev->lock, flags);
The unlock operation could come before the dev_err. We don't need to
protect the printout and save time with the spinlock held.
> > + rq_sa = msg[RQ_SA_8BIT_IDX] >> 1;
> > + netf_rq_lun = msg[NETFN_LUN_IDX];
> > + /*
> > + * subtract rq_sa and netf_rq_lun from the length of the msg passed to
> > + * i2c_smbus_write_block_data_local
> > + */
> > + msg_len = msg[IPMB_MSG_LEN_IDX] - SMBUS_MSG_HEADER_LENGTH;
> > +
> > + strcpy(rq_client.name, "ipmb_requester");
> > + rq_client.adapter = ipmb_dev->client->adapter;
> > + rq_client.flags = ipmb_dev->client->flags;
> > + rq_client.addr = rq_sa;
>
> >> Is it possible to determine in a race-free way if rq_sa (which came
> >> from userspace AFAIU) is really the address from which the request
> >> came in (again if I understood all this correctly)?
> Yes there is. I see 2 options:
>
> 1) This is less explicit than option 2 but uses existing code and is
> simpler. we can use the ipmb_verify_checksum1 function since the IPMB
> response format is as follows:
> Byte 1: rq_sa
> Byte 2: netfunction/rqLUN
> Byte 3: checksum1
Hmmm, does that really prove that rq_sa is the same address the request
came from? Or does it only prove that the response packet is not
mangled?
> So if checksum1 is verified, it means rq_sa is correct.
>
> 2) I am not sure we want this but have a global variable which stores
> the address of the requester once the first request is received. We
> would compare that address with the one received from userspace in the
> code above.
Can there be only one requester in the system?
Thanks,
Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
