On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>A proper arch_remove_memory() implementation is on its way, which also
>cleanly removes page tables in arch_add_memory() in case something goes
>wrong.
Would this be better to understand?
removes page tables created in arch_add_memory
>
>As we want to use arch_remove_memory() in case something goes wrong
>during memory hotplug after arch_add_memory() finished, let's add
>a temporary hack that is sufficient enough until we get a proper
>implementation that cleans up page table entries.
>
>We will remove CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE around this code in follow up
>patches.
>
>Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
>Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
>Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
>Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
>Cc: Chintan Pandya <cpan...@codeaurora.org>
>Cc: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
>Cc: Jun Yao <yaojun8558...@gmail.com>
>Cc: Yu Zhao <yuz...@google.com>
>Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
>Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com>
>Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>index a1bfc4413982..e569a543c384 100644
>--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>@@ -1084,4 +1084,23 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> return __add_pages(nid, start >> PAGE_SHIFT, size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> restrictions);
> }
>+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>+void arch_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
>+ struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>+{
>+ unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>+ unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>+ struct zone *zone;
>+
>+ /*
>+ * FIXME: Cleanup page tables (also in arch_add_memory() in case
>+ * adding fails). Until then, this function should only be used
>+ * during memory hotplug (adding memory), not for memory
>+ * unplug. ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE must not be
>+ * unlocked yet.
>+ */
>+ zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
Compared with arch_remove_memory in x86. If altmap is not NULL, zone will be
retrieved from page related to altmap. Not sure why this is not the same?
>+ __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>+}
>+#endif
> #endif
>--
>2.20.1
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
