On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [..] > > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can > > > be > > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing? > > > > > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just > > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting > > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking? > > > > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release. > > Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on > just bypassing that completely ?
IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems to be most reasonable. > > Daniel > > Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
