On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:24:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These function do not prepare the entire state of the vmcs02, only the
> rarely needed parts. Rename them to make this clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 84438cf23d37..fd8150ef6cce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -1955,7 +1955,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_constant_state(struct
> vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> vmx_set_constant_host_state(vmx);
> }
>
> -static void prepare_vmcs02_early_full(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> +static void prepare_vmcs02_early_extra(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
Or maybe 'uncommon', 'rare' or 'ext'? I don't I particularly love any of
the names, but they're all better than 'full'.
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com>
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> {
> prepare_vmcs02_constant_state(vmx);
> @@ -1976,7 +1976,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> u64 guest_efer = nested_vmx_calc_efer(vmx, vmcs12);
>
> if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
> - prepare_vmcs02_early_full(vmx, vmcs12);
> + prepare_vmcs02_early_extra(vmx, vmcs12);
>
> /*
> * PIN CONTROLS
> @@ -2130,7 +2130,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> }
> }
>
> -static void prepare_vmcs02_full(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> +static void prepare_vmcs02_extra(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> {
> struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *hv_evmcs = vmx->nested.hv_evmcs;
>
> @@ -2254,7 +2254,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
> vmcs12 *vmcs12,
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
>
> if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 || vmx->nested.hv_evmcs) {
> - prepare_vmcs02_full(vmx, vmcs12);
> + prepare_vmcs02_extra(vmx, vmcs12);
> vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 = false;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
