Hi Greg,

On 09/06/19 4:40 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 04:26:55PM +0530, Deepak Mishra wrote:
In process of cleaning up rtl8712 struct _adapter in drv_types.h I have
tried to remove some unused variables and redundant lines of code
associated with those variables. I have also fixed some CamelCase
reported by checkpatch.pl

Deepak Mishra (6):
   staging: rtl8712: Fixed CamelCase for EepromAddressSize
   staging: rtl8712: Removed redundant code from function
     oid_rt_pro_write_register_hdl
   staging: rtl8712: Fixed CamelCase cmdThread rename to cmd_thread
   staging: rtl8712: removed unused variables from struct _adapter
   staging: rtl8712: Renamed CamelCase wkFilterRxFF0 to wk_filter_rx_ff0
   staging: rtl8712: Renamed CamelCase lockRxFF0Filter to
     lock_rx_ff0_filter
If this is a "v4" series, I do not see a list of what has changed from
the previous versions at all here :(

Please list it somewhere, usually in the individual patches below the
--- line, or you can put it here in the 00/XX email as well.

v5 please?
In my previous versions I mainly tried to correct the patch submission based on your suggestion for example
1.keeping every individual task separate.
2. Not only just fix CamelCase but if those variables are unused remove those.
3. If any variable is assigned but never used then remove those.

So should I put these review comments in my 0/6 file and send you the v5 of the patch set,

or remove version number and send a new patch set again as if it is a fresh patch set ?

Please suggest.

Best regards
Deepak Mishra

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to