Re: [RFC V3] mm: Generalize and rename notify_page_fault() as kprobe_page_fault()

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 06/07/2019 05:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
> 
> On Fri,  7 Jun 2019 16:04:15 +0530 Anshuman Khandual 
> <anshuman.khand...@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> +static nokprobe_inline bool kprobe_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +                                          unsigned int trap)
>> +{
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to be allowed
>> +     * to call kprobe_running(), we have to be non-preemptible.
>> +     */
>> +    if (kprobes_built_in() && !preemptible() && !user_mode(regs)) {
>> +            if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, trap))
>> +                    ret = 1;
>> +    }
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
> 
> Since this is now declared as "bool" (thanks for that), you should make
> "ret" be bool and use true and false;

Sure, done.