Hello, On 10/06/2019 09:28:11-0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 03:51:52PM +0000, Ken Sloat wrote: > > Hello Nicolas, > > > > I wanted to open a discussion proposing new functionality to allow > > disabling of the watchdog timer upon entering > > suspend in the SAMA5D2/4. > > > > Typical use case of a hardware watchdog timer in the kernel is a userspace > > application opens the watchdog timer and > > periodically "kicks" it. If the application hits a deadlock somewhere and > > is no longer able to kick it, then the watchdog > > intervenes and often resets the processor. Such is the case for the Atmel > > driver (which also allows a watchdog interrupt > > to be asserted in lieu of a system reset). In most use cases, upon entering > > a low power/suspend state, the application > > will no longer be able to "kick" the watchdog. If the watchdog is not > > disabled or kicked via another method, then it will > > reset the system. This is the current behavior of the Atmel driver as of > > today. > > > > The watchdog peripheral itself does have a "WDIDLEHLT" bit however, and > > this is enabled via the "atmel,idle-halt" dt > > property. However, this is not very useful, as it literally only makes the > > watchdog count when the CPU is active. This > > results in non-deterministic triggering of the WDT and means that if a > > critical application were to crash, it may be > > quite a long time before the WDT would ever trigger. Below is a similar > > statement made in the device-tree doc for this > > peripheral: > > > > - atmel,idle-halt: present if you want to stop the watchdog when the CPU is > > in idle state. > > CAUTION: This property should be used with care, it actually makes the > > watchdog not counting when the CPU is in idle state, therefore the > > watchdog reset time depends on mean CPU usage and will not reset at all > > if the CPU stop working while it is in idle state, which is probably > > not what you want. > > > > It seems to me, that it would be logical and useful to introduce a new > > property that would cause the Atmel WDT > > to disable on suspend and re-enable on resume. It also appears that the WDT > > is re-initialized anyways upon > > resume, so the only piece missing here would really be a dt flag and a call > > to disable. > > > Wondering - why would this need a dt property ? That would be quite unusual. > Is > there a condition where one would _not_ want the watchdog to stop on suspend ? >
There are customers that protects suspend/resume using the watchdog. They wake up their platform every 15s to ping the watchdog. Also, I don't see why the application deciding to go to suspend wouldn't be able to disable the watchdog before do so if this is the wanted policy. > If anything I would suggest to drop atmel,idle-halt completely; it really > looks > like it would make the watchdog unreliable. > > Thanks, > Guenter -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
