Hello,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:14:44AM +0530, Yash Shah wrote:
> [...]
> +static int pwm_sifive_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> + bool is_enabled = false;
> + struct pwm_device *pwm;
> + int ret, ch;
> +
> + for (ch = 0; ch < ddata->chip.npwm; ch++) {
> + pwm = &ddata->chip.pwms[ch];
> + if (pwm->state.enabled) {
> + is_enabled = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (is_enabled)
> + clk_disable(ddata->clk);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk);
> + ret = pwmchip_remove(&ddata->chip);
> + clk_notifier_unregister(ddata->clk, &ddata->notifier);
> +
> + return ret;
I think the return value of a platform driver's remove callback is
ignored. So usually you should return 0.
Not sure this is worth addressing in a new round, so if noone else has
something to criticise that justifies a new round, take my
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>
> +}
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
