Colin King <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > > It appears that there is a missing break statement for the AF_INET6 case > that falls through to the default WARN_ONCE case. I don't think that is > intentional. Fix this by adding in the missing break.
Yes, I sent same patch a few minutes ago: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1114377/ I don't mind which one gets applied.
