On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 01:13:11AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-06-15 at 14:29 -0700, Shobhit Kukreti wrote:
> > Cleaned up the code from the following files to get rid of
> > check patch error "that open brace { should be on the previous line"
> 
> It's fine you are modifying brace styles, but:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
> > index aa2499f..4631b68 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
> > @@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ void rtw_os_indicate_connect(struct adapter *adapter)
> >     struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &(adapter->mlmepriv);
> >  
> >     if ((check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_MASTER_STATE) == true) ||
> > -           (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_STATE) == true))
> > -   {
> > +           (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_STATE) == true)) {
> >             rtw_cfg80211_ibss_indicate_connect(adapter);
> >     }
> >     else
> 
> the else should be on the same line as the close brace
> 
> > @@ -106,8 +105,9 @@ void rtw_reset_securitypriv(struct adapter *adapter)
> >             adapter->securitypriv.ndisencryptstatus = Ndis802_11WEPDisabled;
> >  
> >     }
> > -   else /* reset values in securitypriv */
> > -   {
> > +   else {
> > +           /* reset values in securitypriv */
> > +
> 
> and here.  etc.  Please change all instances appropriately.
Thank you for the feedback. I intented to do one kind of change in a
patch. This probably would need a patch set. Will edit appropriately. 

Best,
Shobhit Kukreti
> 
> 

Reply via email to