On 14-06-19, 10:14, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:21:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > This implements QoS requests to manage userspace configuration of min
> > and max frequency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 8 +---
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 547d221b2ff2..ff754981fcb4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -720,23 +720,15 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> > static ssize_t store_##file_name \
> > (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf, size_t count)
> > \
> > { \
> > - int ret, temp; \
> > - struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; \
> > + unsigned long val; \
> > + int ret; \
> > \
> > - memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); \
> > - new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min; \
> > - new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max; \
> > - \
> > - ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &new_policy.object); \
> > + ret = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &val); \
> > if (ret != 1) \
> > return -EINVAL; \
> > \
> > - temp = new_policy.object; \
> > - ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); \
> > - if (!ret) \
> > - policy->user_policy.object = temp; \
> > - \
> > - return ret ? ret : count; \
> > + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(policy->object##_freq_req, val);\
> > + return ret && ret != 1 ? ret : count; \
>
> nit: I wonder if
>
> return (ret >= 0) ? count : ret;
>
> would be clearer.
Done. Thanks.
> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org>
--
viresh
