> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikolaus Voss [mailto:n...@vosn.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:31 AM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.mo...@intel.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> <r...@rjwysocki.net>; Len Brown <l...@kernel.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schma...@intel.com>; Jacek Anaszewski
> <jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com>; Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>; Dan Murphy
> <dmur...@ti.com>; Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com>; ACPI Devel
> Maling List <linux-a...@vger.kernel.org>; open list:ACPI COMPONENT
> ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA) <de...@acpica.org>; linux-l...@vger.kernel.org;
> Linux PWM List <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; nikolaus.v...@loewensteinmedical.de
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed table
> loads
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Moore, Robert
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:25 PM
> >> To: 'Nikolaus Voss' <n...@vosn.de>
> >> Cc: 'Rafael J. Wysocki' <raf...@kernel.org>; 'Rafael J. Wysocki'
> >> <r...@rjwysocki.net>; 'Len Brown' <l...@kernel.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> >> <erik.schma...@intel.com>; 'Jacek Anaszewski'
> >> <jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com>; 'Pavel Machek' <pa...@ucw.cz>; 'Dan
> >> Murphy' <dmur...@ti.com>; 'Thierry Reding'
> >> <thierry.red...@gmail.com>; 'ACPI Devel Maling List'
> >> <linux-a...@vger.kernel.org>; 'open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE
> >> (ACPICA)' <de...@acpica.org>; 'linux- l...@vger.kernel.org' <linux-
> l...@vger.kernel.org>; 'Linux PWM List'
> >> <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; 'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-
> >> ker...@vger.kernel.org>
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed
> >> table loads
> >>
> >> If it is in fact the AcpiLoadTable interface that is incorrect, that
> >> of course is different. I'll check that out next.
> >>
> > [Moore, Robert]
> >
> > Yes, this is the issue, not specifically the Load() operator, but the
> > AcpiLoadTable interface only.
>
> thanks for checking this out. So what is the conclusion? Is my fix of
> AcpiLoadTable() sufficient or do we need a different solution?
>
> Niko
>
Your change is in the correct area. We want to do something like this, however:
diff --git a/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
b/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
index 84a058ada..eba1a6d28 100644
--- a/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
+++ b/source/components/executer/exconfig.c
@@ -342,10 +342,9 @@ AcpiExLoadTableOp (
return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
}
- /* Complete the initialization/resolution of package objects */
+ /* Complete the initialization/resolution of new objects */
- Status = AcpiNsWalkNamespace (ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
- ACPI_UINT32_MAX, 0, AcpiNsInitOnePackage, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ AcpiNsInitializeObjects ();
/* Parameter Data (optional) */
@@ -620,10 +619,11 @@ AcpiExLoadOp (
return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
}
- /* Complete the initialization/resolution of package objects */
+ /* Complete the initialization/resolution of new objects */
- Status = AcpiNsWalkNamespace (ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
- ACPI_UINT32_MAX, 0, AcpiNsInitOnePackage, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ AcpiExExitInterpreter ();
+ AcpiNsInitializeObjects ();
+ AcpiExEnterInterpreter ();
/* Store the DdbHandle into the Target operand */
diff --git a/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
b/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
index 217d54bf0..1e17db6c8 100644
--- a/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
+++ b/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
@@ -479,6 +479,13 @@ AcpiLoadTable (
ACPI_INFO (("Host-directed Dynamic ACPI Table Load:"));
Status = AcpiTbInstallAndLoadTable (ACPI_PTR_TO_PHYSADDR (Table),
ACPI_TABLE_ORIGIN_EXTERNAL_VIRTUAL, FALSE, &TableIndex);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS (Status))
+ {
+ /* Complete the initialization/resolution of new objects */
+
+ AcpiNsInitializeObjects ();
+ }
+
return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
}
> [...]
