Thanks Greg for a quick review :)
On 20-06-19, 14:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:51:50PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > From: Christian Lamparter <chunk...@googlemail.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a firmware loader for the uPD720201K8-711-BAC-A
> > and uPD720202K8-711-BAA-A variant. Both of these chips are listed
> > in Renesas' R19UH0078EJ0500 Rev.5.00 "User's Manual: Hardware" as
> > devices which need the firmware loader on page 2 in order to
> > work as they "do not support the External ROM".
> >
> > The "Firmware Download Sequence" is describe in chapter
> > "7.1 FW Download Interface" R19UH0078EJ0500 Rev.5.00 page 131.
> >
> > The firmware "K2013080.mem" is available from a USB3.0 Host to
> > PCIe Adapter (PP2U-E card) "Firmware download" archive. An
> > alternative version can be sourced from Netgear's WNDR4700 GPL
> > archives.
> >
> > The release notes of the PP2U-E's "Firmware Download" ver 2.0.1.3
> > (2012-06-15) state that the firmware is for the following devices:
> > - uPD720201 ES 2.0 sample whose revision ID is 2.
> > - uPD720201 ES 2.1 sample & CS sample & Mass product, ID is 3.
> > - uPD720202 ES 2.0 sample & CS sample & Mass product, ID is 2.
> >
> > If someone from Renesas is listening: It would be great, if these
> > firmwares could be added to linux-firmware.git.
>
> That paragraph does not need to be in the changelog :)
Sure will drop :)
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> asm/ in a driver? Are you sure???
Not sure :D, will check and remove
> > +static const struct renesas_fw_entry {
> > + const char *firmware_name;
> > + u16 device;
> > + u8 revision;
> > + u16 expected_version;
> > +} renesas_fw_table[] = {
> > + /*
> > + * Only the uPD720201K8-711-BAC-A or uPD720202K8-711-BAA-A
> > + * are listed in R19UH0078EJ0500 Rev.5.00 as devices which
> > + * need the software loader.
> > + *
> > + * PP2U/ReleaseNote_USB3-201-202-FW.txt:
> > + *
> > + * Note: This firmware is for the following devices.
> > + * - uPD720201 ES 2.0 sample whose revision ID is 2.
> > + * - uPD720201 ES 2.1 sample & CS sample & Mass product, ID is 3.
> > + * - uPD720202 ES 2.0 sample & CS sample & Mass product, ID is 2.
> > + */
> > + { "K2013080.mem", 0x0014, 0x02, 0x2013 },
> > + { "K2013080.mem", 0x0014, 0x03, 0x2013 },
> > + { "K2013080.mem", 0x0015, 0x02, 0x2013 },
> > +};
>
> No MODULE_FIRMWARE() entries as well?
Ah I wasnt even aware we had that, thanks for pointing it out, will add.
> > +static int renesas_fw_download_image(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > + const u32 *fw,
> > + size_t step)
> > +{
> > + size_t i;
> > + int err;
> > + u8 fw_status;
> > + bool data0_or_data1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The hardware does alternate between two 32-bit pages.
> > + * (This is because each row of the firmware is 8 bytes).
> > + *
> > + * for even steps we use DATA0, for odd steps DATA1.
> > + */
> > + data0_or_data1 = (step & 1) == 1;
> > +
> > + /* step+1. Read "Set DATAX" and confirm it is cleared. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
> > + err = pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0xF5, &fw_status);
> > + if (err)
> > + return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
> > + if (!(fw_status & BIT(data0_or_data1)))
> > + break;
> > +
> > + udelay(1);
> > + }
> > + if (i == 10000)
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * step+2. Write FW data to "DATAX".
> > + * "LSB is left" => force little endian
> > + */
> > + err = pci_write_config_dword(dev, data0_or_data1 ? 0xFC : 0xF8,
> > + (__force u32) cpu_to_le32(fw[step]));
> > + if (err)
> > + return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
> > +
> > + udelay(100);
> > +
> > + /* step+3. Set "Set DATAX". */
> > + err = pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0xF5, BIT(data0_or_data1));
> > + if (err)
> > + return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
> > +
>
> Shouldn't you just do a read after the write to be sure the write
> actually went out on the wire? Then you shouldn't have to do the
> udelay, right?
Well I am not sure that is how it works. The register is a DATA register
on the controller. We are writing to the memory of the controller here
and after writing DATA0 and DATA1 we check the Set DATA0 & Set DATA1
bits and write subsequenly only when controller is ready to accept more
data.
I do recall at least for ROM load (writing to NOR flash attached to
controller), we need to wait considerably more before the SetData0/1 was
set and ready for subsequent write
> > +static int renesas_fw_verify(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > + const void *fw_data,
> > + size_t length)
> > +{
> > + const struct renesas_fw_entry *entry = renesas_needs_fw_dl(dev);
> > + u16 fw_version_pointer;
> > + u16 fw_version;
> > +
> > + if (!entry)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The Firmware's Data Format is describe in
> > + * "6.3 Data Format" R19UH0078EJ0500 Rev.5.00 page 124
> > + */
> > +
> > + /* "Each row is 8 bytes". => firmware size must be a multiple of 8. */
> > + if (length % 8 != 0) {
> > + dev_err(&dev->dev, "firmware size is not a multipe of 8.");
>
> "multiple"
Yes will fix
> > +static int renesas_hw_check_run_stop_busy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +#if 0
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * 7.1.3 Note 3: "... must not set 'FW Download Enable' when
> > + * 'RUN/STOP' of USBCMD Register is set"
> > + */
> > + val = readl(hcd->regs + 0x20);
> > + if (val & BIT(0)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "hardware is busy and can't receive a FW.");
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Is this function still really needed anymore?
Nope I will drop it unless Christian objects
> > + /*
> > + * 11. After finishing writing the last data of FW, the
> > + * System Software must clear "FW Download Enable"
> > + */
> > + err = pci_write_config_byte(pdev, 0xF4, 0);
> > + if (err)
> > + return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
> > +
> > + /* 12. Read "Result Code" and confirm it is good. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
> > + err = pci_read_config_byte(pdev, 0xF4, &fw_status);
> > + if (err)
> > + return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
> > + if (fw_status & BIT(4))
> > + break;
> > +
> > + udelay(1);
> > + }
>
> 1000 reads??? I've heard of having to read a few times to ensure
> something "latched" in the device, but not 1000. Why so many?
For ROM load it did need significant time, I will check if we can go down
to 100 here
> > + if (i == 10000) {
> > + /* Timed out / Error - let's see if we can fix this */
> > + err = renesas_fw_check_running(pdev);
> > + switch (err) {
> > + case 0: /*
> > + * we shouldn't end up here.
> > + * maybe it took a little bit longer.
> > + * But all should be well?
> > + */
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case 1: /* (No result yet? - we can try to retry) */
> > + if (retry_counter < 10) {
> > + retry_counter++;
> > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Retry Firmware download:
> > %d try.",
> > + retry_counter);
> > + return renesas_fw_download(pdev, fw,
> > + retry_counter);
>
> recursion?
I didnt encounter the need, we should remove it unless Christian objects
> > +static void renesas_fw_callback(const struct firmware *fw,
> > + void *context)
> > +{
> > + struct renesas_fw_ctx *ctx = context;
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = ctx->pdev;
> > + struct device *parent = pdev->dev.parent;
> > + int err = -ENOENT;
> > +
> > + if (fw) {
> > + err = renesas_fw_verify(pdev, fw->data, fw->size);
> > + if (!err) {
> > + err = renesas_fw_download(pdev, fw, 0);
> > + release_firmware(fw);
> > + if (!err) {
> > + if (ctx->resume)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + err = xhci_pci_probe(pdev, ctx->id);
> > + if (!err) {
> > + /* everything worked */
> > + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, ctx);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* in case of an error - fall through */
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "firmware failed to
> > download (%d).",
> > + err);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "firmware failed to load (%d).", err);
> > + }
>
> This can be cleaned up a lot by just erroring out when something
> happens, and then jumping to the end. Not this nested if mess.
will do
> > + err = renesas_fw_check_running(pdev);
> > + /* Also go ahead, if the firmware is running */
> > + if (err == 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* At this point, we can be sure that the FW isn't ready. */
> > + return err;
>
> Why not just:
> return renesas_fw_check_running(pdev);
sounds good, will change :)
--
~Vinod
