On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 04:09:16PM +0200, Dag Moxnes wrote:
> Use neighbour lock when copying MAC address from neighbour data struct
> in dst_fetch_ha.
> 
> When not using the lock, it is possible for the function to race with
> neigh_update, causing it to copy an invalid MAC address.
> 
> It is possible to provoke this error by calling rdma_resolve_addr in a
> tight loop, while deleting the corresponding ARP entry in another tight
> loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dag Moxnes <[email protected]>
> Change-Id: I3c5f982b304457f0a83ea7def2fac70315ed38b4
>  drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> index 2f7d141598..e4945fd1bb 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> @@ -333,12 +333,16 @@ static int dst_fetch_ha(const struct dst_entry *dst,
>       if (!n)
>               return -ENODATA;
>  
> +     read_lock_bh(&n->lock)
>       if (!(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
> -             neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
>               ret = -ENODATA;
>       } else {
>               memcpy(dev_addr->dst_dev_addr, n->ha, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
>       }
> +     read_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
> +
> +     if (ret)
> +             neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
>  
>       neigh_release(n);

Can we write this with less spaghetti please, maybe:

static int dst_fetch_ha(const struct dst_entry *dst,
                        struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
                        const void *daddr)
{
        struct neighbour *n;
        int ret = 0;

        n = dst_neigh_lookup(dst, daddr);
        if (!n)
                return -ENODATA;

        read_lock_bh(&n->lock);
        if (!(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
                read_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
                goto out_send;
        }
        memcpy(dev_addr->dst_dev_addr, n->ha, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
        read_unlock_bh(&n->lock);

        goto out_release;

out_send:
        neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
        ret = -ENODATA;
out_release:
        neigh_release(n);

        return ret;
}

Also, Parav should look at it.

Thanks,
Jason

Reply via email to