On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 19:38 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:16AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe > > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to > > a common place instead of duplicate code. > > > > To: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > > To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com> > > [Tested on QDF2400] > > Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jh...@codeaurora.org> > > [Tested on Juno and other embedded platforms.] > > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Paul, I guess Greg has acked the series assuming that it will go through some other tree. Can you take it through RISC-V tree ? Sorry for the confusion. Note: We are still waiting for RMK's ACK on arm patch before it can be sent as a PR. Regards, Atish
