Hi, Leonard > -----Original Message----- > From: Leonard Crestez > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 2:01 PM > To: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>; Jacky Bai <ping....@nxp.com>; > l.st...@pengutronix.de > Cc: robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; > s.ha...@pengutronix.de; ker...@pengutronix.de; feste...@gmail.com; > viresh.ku...@linaro.org; Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@nxp.com>; Abel > Vesa <abel.v...@nxp.com>; andrew.smir...@gmail.com; > ccai...@baylibre.com; an...@akkea.ca; a...@sigxcpu.org; > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Correct OPP table according to > latest datasheet > > On 28.06.2019 06:37, anson.hu...@nxp.com wrote: > > > According to latest datasheet (Rev.0.2, 04/2019) from below links, > > 1.8GHz is ONLY available for consumer part, so the market segment bits > > for 1.8GHz opp should ONLY available for consumer part accordingly. > > > > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>; > > opp-microvolt = <1000000>; > > /* Consumer only but rely on speed grading */ > > - opp-supported-hw = <0x8>, <0x7>; > > + opp-supported-hw = <0x8>, <0x3>; > > Only consumer parts should be fused for this highest OPP. If you don't want > to rely on this then maybe also delete the comment above?
As I replied in previous i.MX8MQ patch, if the comments make reader confused, should we just remove all those comments? Thanks, Anson. > > -- > Regards, > leonard
