Am 01.07.2019 15:04, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>
> There is an spelling mistake in an a test error message. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> index 4602326b8f5b..a4f4d4cf22c3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int test_vsys_x(void)
> printf("[OK]\tExecuting the vsyscall page failed: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
> segv_err);
> } else {
> - printf("[FAILT]\tExecution failed with the wrong error:
> #PF(0x%lx)\n",
> + printf("[FAIL]\tExecution failed with the wrong error:
> #PF(0x%lx)\n",
> segv_err);
> return 1;
> }
"wrong error" sounds like scratching table, perhaps "error" is here sufficient ?
Bomus points when user is expected to report this.
re,
wh
