On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:03:02PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:52 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote: > > > > There is still the question if it it should be implemented as a nested > > attribute which could look like the current compact form without the > > "list" flag (if there is no mask, it's a list). Or an unstructured data > > block consisting of u32 bit length > > You wouldn't really need the length, since the attribute has a length > already :-)
It has byte length, not bit length. The bitmaps we are dealing with can have any bit length, not necessarily multiples of 8 (or even 32). Michal
