On 2019-07-08 15:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The structure is too large to put on the stack, resulting in a
> warning on 32-bit ARM:
> 
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c:59:5: error: stack 
> frame size of 1344 bytes in function
>        'mlx5e_open_xsk' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> 
> Use kzalloc() instead.
> 
> Fixes: a038e9794541 ("net/mlx5e: Add XSK zero-copy support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> ---
>   .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c         | 25 ++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c
> index aaffa6f68dc0..db9bbec68dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c
> @@ -60,24 +60,28 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct 
> mlx5e_params *params,
>                  struct mlx5e_xsk_param *xsk, struct xdp_umem *umem,
>                  struct mlx5e_channel *c)
>   {
> -     struct mlx5e_channel_param cparam = {};
> +     struct mlx5e_channel_param *cparam;
>       struct dim_cq_moder icocq_moder = {};
>       int err;
>   
>       if (!mlx5e_validate_xsk_param(params, xsk, priv->mdev))
>               return -EINVAL;
>   
> -     mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam);
> +     cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL);

Similar code in mlx5e_open_channels (en_main.c) uses kvzalloc. Although 
the struct is currently smaller than a page anyway, and there should be 
no difference in behavior now, I suggest using the same alloc function 
to keep code uniform.

> +     if (!cparam)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -     err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->rx_cq_moderation, &cparam.rx_cq, 
> &c->xskrq.cq);
> +     mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, cparam);
> +
> +     err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->rx_cq_moderation, &cparam->rx_cq, 
> &c->xskrq.cq);
>       if (unlikely(err))
> -             return err;
> +             goto err_kfree_cparam;
>   
> -     err = mlx5e_open_rq(c, params, &cparam.rq, xsk, umem, &c->xskrq);
> +     err = mlx5e_open_rq(c, params, &cparam->rq, xsk, umem, &c->xskrq);
>       if (unlikely(err))
>               goto err_close_rx_cq;
>   
> -     err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->tx_cq_moderation, &cparam.tx_cq, 
> &c->xsksq.cq);
> +     err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->tx_cq_moderation, &cparam->tx_cq, 
> &c->xsksq.cq);
>       if (unlikely(err))
>               goto err_close_rq;
>   
> @@ -87,18 +91,18 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct 
> mlx5e_params *params,
>        * is disabled and then reenabled, but the SQ continues receiving CQEs
>        * from the old UMEM.
>        */
> -     err = mlx5e_open_xdpsq(c, params, &cparam.xdp_sq, umem, &c->xsksq, 
> true);
> +     err = mlx5e_open_xdpsq(c, params, &cparam->xdp_sq, umem, &c->xsksq, 
> true);
>       if (unlikely(err))
>               goto err_close_tx_cq;
>   
> -     err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, icocq_moder, &cparam.icosq_cq, &c->xskicosq.cq);
> +     err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, icocq_moder, &cparam->icosq_cq, &c->xskicosq.cq);
>       if (unlikely(err))
>               goto err_close_sq;
>   
>       /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be
>        * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU.
>        */
> -     err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq);
> +     err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq);
>       if (unlikely(err))
>               goto err_close_icocq;
>   

Here is kfree missing. It's a memory leak in the good path.

Thanks!

> @@ -123,6 +127,9 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct 
> mlx5e_params *params,
>   err_close_rx_cq:
>       mlx5e_close_cq(&c->xskrq.cq);
>   
> +err_kfree_cparam:
> +     kfree(cparam);
> +
>       return err;
>   }
>   
> 

Reply via email to