On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:05 AM Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io> wrote:
>
> /* Syscall number 435 */
> clone3() uses syscall number 435 and is coordinated with pidfd_open() which
> uses syscall number 434. I'm not aware of any other syscall targeted for
> 5.3 that has chosen the same number.
You say that, and 434/435 would make sense, but that's not what the
code I see in the pull request actually does.
It seems to use syscall 436.
I think it's because openat2() is looking to use 435, but I'm a bit
nervous about the conflict between the code and your commentary..
Linus
