On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:24:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:05 AM Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io> wrote: > > > > /* Syscall number 435 */ > > clone3() uses syscall number 435 and is coordinated with pidfd_open() which > > uses syscall number 434. I'm not aware of any other syscall targeted for > > 5.3 that has chosen the same number. > > You say that, and 434/435 would make sense, but that's not what the > code I see in the pull request actually does. > > It seems to use syscall 436. > > I think it's because openat2() is looking to use 435, but I'm a bit > nervous about the conflict between the code and your commentary..
Sorry, that was just me being dumb and forgetting that there was close_range() which had a chance of going through Al's tree. So I left a hole for it. I don't terribly mind if it's 435 or 436. People pointed out you might even renumber yourself if something makes more sense to you. Christian
