We want users to code properly and fix the post_div_table missing and not rely on core to check. So remove the post_div_table check.
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]> --- drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c index b48707693ffd..2c6773188761 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c @@ -1036,11 +1036,6 @@ static unsigned long clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, u32 i, div = 1, val; int ret; - if (!pll->post_div_table) { - pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val); if (ret) return ret; @@ -1063,11 +1058,6 @@ static long clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, { struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll_postdiv(hw); - if (!pll->post_div_table) { - pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, prate, pll->post_div_table, pll->width, CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST); } @@ -1089,11 +1079,6 @@ static int clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, if (val & PLL_VOTE_FSM_ENA) return 0; - if (!pll->post_div_table) { - pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(parent_rate, rate); for (i = 0; i < pll->num_post_div; i++) { if (pll->post_div_table[i].div == div) { -- 2.20.1
