On 22/07/19 10:21, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > On 7/19/19 3:59 PM, Juri Lelli wrote: > > From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]> > > [...] > > > @@ -4269,8 +4269,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, > > */ > > if (!cpumask_subset(span, &p->cpus_allowed) || > > This doesn't apply cleanly on v5.3-rc1 anymore due to commit > 3bd3706251ee ("sched/core: Provide a pointer to the valid CPU mask"). > > > rq->rd->dl_bw.bw == 0) { > > - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); > > - return -EPERM; > > + retval = -EPERM; > > + goto unlock; > > } > > } > > #endif
Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if needed. Best, Juri
