On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:31:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last
> > week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if
> > needed.
> 
> TJ; I would like to take these patches through the scheduler tree if you
> don't mind. Afaict there's no real conflict vs cgroup/for-next (I
> applied the patches and then did a pull of cgroup/for-next which
> finished without complaints).

Yeah, for sure, please go ahead.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Reply via email to