23.07.2019 4:41, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 23.07.2019 4:08, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> 23.07.2019 3:58, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> 21.07.2019 22:40, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>> This patch implements PMC wakeup sequence for Tegra210 and defines
>>>> common used RTC alarm wake event.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatin...@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 111 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>>> index 91c84d0e66ae..c556f38874e1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>>> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@
>>>>  #define  PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_OE              BIT(11) /* system clock enable 
>>>> */
>>>>  #define  PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_POLARITY        BIT(10) /* sys clk polarity */
>>>>  #define  PMC_CNTRL_MAIN_RST               BIT(4)
>>>> +#define  PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS  BIT(5)
>>
>> Please follow the TRM's bits naming.
>>
>> PMC_CNTRL_LATCHWAKE_EN
>>
>>>> +#define PMC_WAKE_MASK                     0x0c
>>>> +#define PMC_WAKE_LEVEL                    0x10
>>>> +#define PMC_WAKE_STATUS                   0x14
>>>> +#define PMC_SW_WAKE_STATUS                0x18
>>>>  
>>>>  #define DPD_SAMPLE                        0x020
>>>>  #define  DPD_SAMPLE_ENABLE                BIT(0)
>>>> @@ -87,6 +93,11 @@
>>>>  
>>>>  #define PMC_SCRATCH41                     0x140
>>>>  
>>>> +#define PMC_WAKE2_MASK                    0x160
>>>> +#define PMC_WAKE2_LEVEL                   0x164
>>>> +#define PMC_WAKE2_STATUS          0x168
>>>> +#define PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS               0x16c
>>>> +
>>>>  #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL                   0x1b0
>>>>  #define  PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_SCRATCH_WRITE    BIT(2)
>>>>  #define  PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_ENABLE_RST       BIT(1)
>>>> @@ -1922,6 +1933,55 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops 
>>>> tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops = {
>>>>    .alloc = tegra_pmc_irq_alloc,
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>> +static int tegra210_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int 
>>>> on)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>>>> +  unsigned int offset, bit;
>>>> +  u32 value;
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (data->hwirq == ULONG_MAX)
>>>> +          return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +  offset = data->hwirq / 32;
>>>> +  bit = data->hwirq % 32;
>>>> +
>>>> +  /*
>>>> +   * Latch wakeups to SW_WAKE_STATUS register to capture events
>>>> +   * that would not make it into wakeup event register during LP0 exit.
>>>> +   */
>>>> +  value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL);
>>>> +  value |= PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS;
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL);
>>>> +  udelay(120);
>>>
>>> Why it takes so much time to latch the values? Shouldn't some status-bit
>>> be polled for the completion of latching?
>>>
>>> Is this register-write really getting buffered in the PMC?
>>>
>>>> +  value &= ~PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS;
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL);
>>>> +  udelay(120);
>>>
>>> 120 usecs to remove latching, really?
>>>
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_SW_WAKE_STATUS);
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS);
>>>> +
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_WAKE_STATUS);
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_WAKE2_STATUS);
>>>> +
>>>> +  /* enable PMC wake */
>>>> +  if (data->hwirq >= 32)
>>>> +          offset = PMC_WAKE2_MASK;
>>>> +  else
>>>> +          offset = PMC_WAKE_MASK;
>>>> +
>>>> +  value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset);
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (on)
>>>> +          value |= 1 << bit;
>>>> +  else
>>>> +          value &= ~(1 << bit);
>>>> +
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, offset);
>>>
>>> Why the latching is done *before* writing into the WAKE registers? What
>>> it is latching then?
>>
>> I'm looking at the TRM doc and it says that latching should be done
>> *after* writing to the WAKE_MASK / LEVEL registers.
>>
>> Secondly it says that it's enough to do:
>>
>> value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL);
>> value |= PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS;
>> tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL);
>>
>> in order to latch. There is no need for the delay and to remove the
>> "LATCHWAKE_EN" bit, it should be a oneshot action.
> 
> Although, no. TRM says "stops latching on transition from 1
> to 0 (sequence - set to 1,set to 0)", so it's not a oneshot action.
> 
> Have you tested this code at all? I'm wondering how it happens to work
> without a proper latching.

Okay, I re-read the TRM and apparently "latching" just means storing of
WAKE-event bit in the WAKE-status register if latching is enabled. Hence
the PMC_CNTRL_LATCHWAKE_EN should be enabled in tegra_pmc_suspend() and
unset in tegra_pmc_resume().

Also, apparently, on resume from suspend the interrupt should be
re-triggered in accordance to the WAKE-status, then the WAKE-status need
to be cleared.

>>>> +  return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int 
>>>> on)
>>>>  {
>>>>    struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>>>> @@ -1954,6 +2014,49 @@ static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct 
>>>> irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>>>>    return 0;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +static int tegra210_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int 
>>>> type)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>>>> +  unsigned int offset, bit;
>>>> +  u32 value;
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (data->hwirq == ULONG_MAX)
>>>> +          return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +  offset = data->hwirq / 32;
>>>> +  bit = data->hwirq % 32;
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (data->hwirq >= 32)
>>>> +          offset = PMC_WAKE2_LEVEL;
>>>> +  else
>>>> +          offset = PMC_WAKE_LEVEL;
>>>> +
>>>> +  value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset);
>>>> +
>>>> +  switch (type) {
>>>> +  case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>>>> +  case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>>>> +          value |= 1 << bit;
>>>> +          break;
>>>> +
>>>> +  case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>>>> +  case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
>>>> +          value &= ~(1 << bit);
>>>> +          break;
>>>> +
>>>> +  case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>>>> +          value ^= 1 << bit;
>>>> +          break;
>>>> +
>>>> +  default:
>>>> +          return -EINVAL;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, offset);
>>>
>>> Shouldn't the WAKE_LEVEL be latched as well?
>>>
>>>> +  return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int 
>>>> type)
>>>>  {
>>>>    struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>>>> @@ -2540,6 +2643,10 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc 
>>>> tegra210_pin_descs[] = {
>>>>    TEGRA210_IO_PAD_TABLE(TEGRA_IO_PIN_DESC)
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>> +static const struct tegra_wake_event tegra210_wake_events[] = {
>>>> +  TEGRA_WAKE_IRQ("rtc", 16, 2),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>>  static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc = {
>>>>    .num_powergates = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_powergates),
>>>>    .powergates = tegra210_powergates,
>>>> @@ -2557,10 +2664,14 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc 
>>>> = {
>>>>    .regs = &tegra20_pmc_regs,
>>>>    .init = tegra20_pmc_init,
>>>>    .setup_irq_polarity = tegra20_pmc_setup_irq_polarity,
>>>> +  .irq_set_wake = tegra210_pmc_irq_set_wake,
>>>> +  .irq_set_type = tegra210_pmc_irq_set_type,
>>>>    .reset_sources = tegra210_reset_sources,
>>>>    .num_reset_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_reset_sources),
>>>>    .reset_levels = NULL,
>>>>    .num_reset_levels = 0,
>>>> +  .num_wake_events = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_wake_events),
>>>> +  .wake_events = tegra210_wake_events,
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>>  #define TEGRA186_IO_PAD_TABLE(_pad)                                       
>>>>      \
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Reply via email to