On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > Sorry, I saw that after writing that. You are right, if the others > > > don't object, that's fine with me. I'll go poke the various build > > > systems that are failing right now on 5.3-rc1 and try to get them fixed > > > for this reason. > > > > Ok, I dug around and the gold linker is not being used here, only clang > > to build the source and GNU ld to link, and I am still seeing this > > error. > > Odd combo.
I'm not disagreeing :) Wait, does clang link things itself and not need ld? > > Hm, clang 8 does not cause this error, but clang 9 does. Let me go poke > > the people who are providing this version of clang to see if there's > > something they can figure out. > > Let me try that with my clang variant. Which version of GNU ld are you > using? I think it is 2.27: $ ./ld --version GNU ld (binutils-2.27-44492f8) 2.27.0.20170315 Which does feel old to me. I know 2.32 works fine. Gotta love old tool-chains :( greg k-h
