On 07/24, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(pidfd_wait, int, pidfd, int __user *, stat_addr,
> + siginfo_t __user *, info, struct rusage __user *, ru,
> + unsigned int, states, unsigned int, flags)
> +{
Oh, I too think that P_PIDFD makes more sense.
and could you explain in the changelog why? I am not arguing and if
nothing else this is consistent with other pidfd features, but if you
are parent/debugger you can't hit the problem with pid-reuse, unless
you races with your sub-threads.
Oleg.
