On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:40:07PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> When a Slave reports multiple status in the sticky bits, find the
> latest configuration from the mirror of the PING frame status and
> update the status directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c 
> b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> index 889fa2cd49ae..25d5c7267c15 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> @@ -643,13 +643,35 @@ static int cdns_update_slave_status(struct sdw_cdns 
> *cdns,
>  
>               /* first check if Slave reported multiple status */
>               if (set_status > 1) {
> +                     u32 val;
> +
>                       dev_warn_ratelimited(cdns->dev,
> -                                          "Slave reported multiple Status: 
> %d\n",
> -                                          mask);
> -                     /*
> -                      * TODO: we need to reread the status here by
> -                      * issuing a PING cmd
> -                      */
> +                                          "Slave %d reported multiple 
> Status: %d\n",
> +                                          i, mask);
> +
> +                     /* re-check latest status extracted from PING commands 
> */
> +                     val = cdns_readl(cdns, CDNS_MCP_SLAVE_STAT);
> +                     val >>= (i * 2);

Superfluous parentheses.

> +
> +                     switch (val & 0x3) {
> +                     case 0:
> +                             status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 1:
> +                             status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 2:
> +                             status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_ALERT;
> +                             break;
> +                     default:

There aren't many values left for the "default" case :-) But I'm not sure 
whether
any of

+                       case 3:

or

+                       case 3:
+                       default:

would improve readability.

Thanks
Guennadi

> +                             status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_RESERVED;
> +                             break;
> +                     }
> +
> +                     dev_warn_ratelimited(cdns->dev,
> +                                          "Slave %d status updated to %d\n",
> +                                          i, status[i]);
> +
>               }
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> alsa-de...@alsa-project.org
> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

Reply via email to