On Fri 26-07-19 07:48:36, Pengfei Li wrote: [...] > For the benefit, "order" may be negative, which is confusing and weird.
order = -1 has a special meaning. > There is no good reason not to do this since it can be avoided. "This is good because we can do it" doesn't really sound like a convincing argument to me. I would understand if this reduced a generated code, made an overall code readability much better or something along those lines. Also we only use MAX_ORDER range of values so I could argue that a smaller data type (e.g. short) should be sufficient for this data type. Please note that _any_ change, alebit seemingly small, can introduce a subtle bug. Also each patch requires a man power to review so you have to understand that "just because we can" is not a strong motivation for people to spend their time on such a patch. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs