On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 03:35, Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> A future patch is going to change semantics of clk_register() so that
> clk_hw::init is guaranteed to be NULL after a clk is registered. Avoid
> referencing this member here so that we don't run into NULL pointer
> exceptions.
>
> Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chun...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> Please ack so I can take this through clk tree
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chun...@linaro.org>
Thanks.
>
> drivers/clk/sprd/common.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c b/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c
> index a5bdca1de5d0..9d56eac43832 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c
> @@ -76,16 +76,17 @@ int sprd_clk_probe(struct device *dev, struct
> clk_hw_onecell_data *clkhw)
> struct clk_hw *hw;
>
> for (i = 0; i < clkhw->num; i++) {
> + const char *name;
>
> hw = clkhw->hws[i];
> -
> if (!hw)
> continue;
>
> + name = hw->init->name;
> ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Couldn't register clock %d - %s\n",
> - i, hw->init->name);
> + i, name);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> --
> Sent by a computer through tubes
>
