On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:41:14AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:04:25 +0300
Based on net/master
I wonder about that because:
Applies cleanly on net/master, but line num is not correct.
I've sent v2.
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr
*opt,
spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
free_sched:
- kfree(new_admin);
+ if (new_admin)
+ call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
return err;
In my tree the context around line 1451 is:
nla_nest_end(skb, sched_nest);
done:
rcu_read_unlock();
return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
which is part of function taprio_dump().
Please respin this properly against current 'net' sources.
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
