On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:36:23AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > Switch to our own constant for the satp register instead of using > > > the old name from a legacy version of the privileged spec. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > > > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com> > > > > Didn't you want us to replace this with Bin Meng's patch? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190807151316.gb16...@infradead.org/ > > > > If so, probably best just to drop this one and state a dependency. > > Either way is fine with me. But until you have a branch with > either one applied I'm going to keep resending my patch, as random > dependencies on uncommitted patches don't work.
If you're going to resend a patch, it's better to resend the other one that you've explicitly endorsed in favor of your own. - Paul
