On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:44:10 -0400 Joel Fernandes <j...@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> I am also more on the side of using *_ONCE. To me, by principal, I > would be willing to convert any concurrent plain access using _ONCE, > just so we don't have to worry about it now or in the future and also > documents the access. > > Perhaps the commit message can be reworded to mention that the _ONCE > is an additional clean up for safe access. The most I'll take is two separate patches. One is going to be marked for stable as it fixes a real bug. The other is more for cosmetic or theoretical issues, that I will state clearly "NOT FOR STABLE", such that the autosel doesn't take them. -- Steve
