Hi! > The most I'll take is two separate patches. One is going to be marked > for stable as it fixes a real bug. The other is more for cosmetic or > theoretical issues, that I will state clearly "NOT FOR STABLE", such > that the autosel doesn't take them.
Do we have standartized way to mark "this is not for stable"? Because
I often think "I'd really hate to see this in stable"...
On a related note, it would be nice to have standartized way to
marking corresponding upstream commit. (Currently three methods are in
use).
Upstream: XXXX
in the signoff area would be nice, clearly marking who touched the
patch before mainline and who after.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
