On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:35:23 +0800
Tina Zhang <tina.zh...@intel.com> wrote:

> Cap the number of irqs with fixed indexes and use capability chains
> to chain device specific irqs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <tina.zh...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 02bb7ad6e986..d83c9f136a5b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -444,11 +444,27 @@ struct vfio_irq_info {
>  #define VFIO_IRQ_INFO_MASKABLE               (1 << 1)
>  #define VFIO_IRQ_INFO_AUTOMASKED     (1 << 2)
>  #define VFIO_IRQ_INFO_NORESIZE               (1 << 3)
> +#define VFIO_IRQ_INFO_FLAG_CAPS              (1 << 4) /* Info supports caps 
> */
>       __u32   index;          /* IRQ index */
>       __u32   count;          /* Number of IRQs within this index */
> +     __u32   cap_offset;     /* Offset within info struct of first cap */
>  };
>  #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO     _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 9)
>  
> +/*
> + * The irq type capability allows irqs unique to a specific device or
> + * class of devices to be exposed.
> + *
> + * The structures below define version 1 of this capability.
> + */
> +#define VFIO_IRQ_INFO_CAP_TYPE      3

Why 3?  What's using 1 and 2 of this newly defined info cap ID?  Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +struct vfio_irq_info_cap_type {
> +     struct vfio_info_cap_header header;
> +     __u32 type;     /* global per bus driver */
> +     __u32 subtype;  /* type specific */
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 10, struct 
> vfio_irq_set)
>   *
> @@ -550,7 +566,8 @@ enum {
>       VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX,
>       VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX,
>       VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX,
> -     VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS
> +     VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS = 5   /* Fixed user ABI, IRQ indexes >=5 use   */
> +                             /* device specific cap to define content */
>  };
>  
>  /*

Reply via email to