On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:27:33 +0200, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
> > @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_smi_direct_write(struct
> > mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> > {
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = mdiobus_write_nested(chip->bus, dev, reg, data);
> > + ret = mdiobus_write_sts_nested(chip->bus, dev, reg, data,
> > + chip->ptp_sts);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
>
> Please also make a similar change to mv88e6xxx_smi_indirect_write().
> The last write in that function should be timestamped.
>
> Vivien, please could you think about these changes with respect to
> RMU. We probably want to skip the RMU in this case, so we get slow but
> uniform jitter, vs fast and unpredictable jitter from using the RMU.
The RMU will have its own mv88e6xxx_bus_ops.
