set_process_cpu_timer() checks already whether the clock id is valid. No
point in checking the return value of the sample function. That allows to
simplify the sample function later.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1204,14 +1204,13 @@ void set_process_cpu_timer(struct task_s
                           u64 *newval, u64 *oldval)
 {
        u64 now;
-       int ret;
 
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(clock_idx >= CPUCLOCK_SCHED))
                return;
 
-       ret = cpu_clock_sample_group(clock_idx, tsk, &now, true);
+       cpu_clock_sample_group(clock_idx, tsk, &now, true);
 
-       if (oldval && ret != -EINVAL) {
+       if (oldval) {
                /*
                 * We are setting itimer. The *oldval is absolute and we update
                 * it to be relative, *newval argument is relative and we update


Reply via email to