On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(kc->timer_wait_running)) > > + kc->timer_wait_running(timer); > > This looks weird. The only place calling yor new method only does so > after checking that it is not set and actually warns if it set?
Yeah, that wants to be;
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!kc->timer_wait_running))
kc->timer_wait_running(timer);

