> On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:06 PM, David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 21.08.19 20:59, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Aug 21, 2019, at 11:57 AM, David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21.08.19 11:41, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>> There is no reason to print generic warnings when balloon memory
>>>> allocation fails, as failures are expected and can be handled
>>>> gracefully. Since VMware balloon now uses balloon-compaction
>>>> infrastructure, and suppressed these warnings before, it is also
>>>> beneficial to suppress these warnings to keep the same behavior that the
>>>> balloon had before.
>>>>
>>>> Since such warnings can still be useful to indicate that the balloon is
>>>> over-inflated, print more informative and less frightening warning if
>>>> allocation fails instead.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> * Print informative warnings instead suppressing [David]
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/balloon_compaction.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/balloon_compaction.c b/mm/balloon_compaction.c
>>>> index 798275a51887..0c1d1f7689f0 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/balloon_compaction.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/balloon_compaction.c
>>>> @@ -124,7 +124,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(balloon_page_list_dequeue);
>>>> struct page *balloon_page_alloc(void)
>>>> {
>>>> struct page *page = alloc_page(balloon_mapping_gfp_mask() |
>>>> - __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY);
>>>> + __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY |
>>>> + __GFP_NOWARN);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!page)
>>>> + pr_warn_ratelimited("memory balloon: memory allocation failed");
>>>> +
>>>> return page;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(balloon_page_alloc);
>>>
>>> Not sure if "memory balloon" is the right wording. hmmm.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>>
>> Do you have a better suggestion?
>
> Not really - that's why I ack'ed :)
>
> However, thinking about it - what about moving the check + print to the
> caller and then using dev_warn... or sth. like simple "virtio_balloon:
> ..." ? You can then drop the warning for vmware balloon if you feel like
> not needing it.
Actually, there is already a warning that is printed by the virtue_balloon
in fill_balloon():
struct page *page = balloon_page_alloc();
if (!page) {
dev_info_ratelimited(&vb->vdev->dev,
"Out of puff! Can't get %u
pages\n",
VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE);
/* Sleep for at least 1/5 of a second before retry. */
msleep(200);
break;
}
So are you ok with going back to v1?
